Do Catholics Worship Idols and Statues?

I was born into a Catholic family and will base this argument/discussion from personal experience.

In the first place, the answer is a big NO, Catholics DO NOT worship statutes.

Never have. Never will.

As much as I love constructive criticisms, I do get frustrated when people cling to such inaccurate perceptions.

I turn to the excellent resource, Catholic Answers, for an explanation for Catholic belief regarding this issue:

“Catholics worship statues!” People still make this ridiculous claim. Because Catholics have statues in their churches, goes the accusation, they are violating God’s commandment: “You shall not make for yourself a graven image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: you shall not bow down to them or serve them” (Ex. 20:4–5); “Alas, this people have sinned a great sin; they have made for themselves gods of gold” (Ex. 32:31).

It is right to warn people against the sin of idolatry when they are committing it. But calling Catholics idolaters because they have images of Christ and the saints is based on misunderstanding or ignorance of what the Bible says about the purpose and uses (both good and bad) of statues. ”

People who oppose religious statuary forget about the many passages where the Lord commands the making of statues. For example: “And you shall make two cherubim of gold [i.e., two gold statues of angels]; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece of the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends. The cherubim shall spread out their wings above, overshadowing the mercy seat with their wings, their faces one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubim be” (Ex. 25:18–20).

David gave Solomon the plan “for the altar of incense made of refined gold, and its weight; also his plan for the golden chariot of the cherubim that spread their wings and covered the ark of the covenant of the Lord. All this he made clear by the writing of the hand of the Lord concerning it all, all the work to be done according to the plan” (1 Chr. 28:18–19). David’s plan for the temple, which the biblical author tells us was “by the writing of the hand of the Lord concerning it all,” included statues of angels.

Similarly Ezekiel 41:17–18 describes graven (carved) images in the idealized temple he was shown in a vision, for he writes, “On the walls round about in the inner room and [on] the nave were carved likenesses of cherubim.”

The Religious Uses of Images

During a plague of serpents sent to punish the Israelites during the exodus, God told Moses to “make [a statue of] a fiery serpent, and set it on a pole; and every one who is bitten, when he sees it shall live. So Moses made a bronze serpent, and set it on a pole; and if a serpent bit any man, he would look at the bronze serpent and live” (Num. 21:8–9).

One had to look at the bronze statue of the serpent to be healed, which shows that statues could be used ritually, not merely as religious decorations.

Catholics use statues, paintings, and other artistic devices to recall the person or thing depicted. Just as it helps to remember one’s mother by looking at her photograph, so it helps to recall the example of the saints by looking at pictures of them. Catholics also use statues as teaching tools. In the early Church they were especially useful for the instruction of the illiterate. Many Protestants have pictures of Jesus and other Bible pictures in Sunday school for teaching children. Catholics also use statues to commemorate certain people and events, much as Protestant churches have three-dimensional nativity scenes at Christmas.

If one measured Protestants by the same rule, then by using these “graven” images, they would be practicing the “idolatry” of which they accuse Catholics. But there’s no idolatry going on in these situations. God forbids the worship of images as gods, but he doesn’t ban the making of images. If he had, religious movies, videos, photographs, paintings, and all similar things would be banned. But, as the case of the bronze serpent shows, God does not even forbid the ritual use of religious images.

It is when people begin to adore a statue as a god that the Lord becomes angry. Thus when people did start to worship the bronze serpent as a snake-god (whom they named “Nehushtan”), the righteous king Hezekiah had it destroyed (2 Kgs. 18:4).

What About Bowing?

Sometimes anti-Catholics cite Deuteronomy 5:9, where God said concerning idols, “You shall not bow down to them.” Since many Catholics sometimes bow or kneel in front of statues of Jesus and the saints, anti-Catholics confuse the legitimate veneration of a sacred image with the sin of idolatry.

Though bowing can be used as a posture in worship, not all bowing is worship. In Japan, people show respect by bowing in greeting (the equivalent of the Western handshake). Similarly, a person can kneel before a king without worshipping him as a god. In the same way, a Catholic who may kneel in front of a statue while praying isn’t worshipping the statue or even praying to it, any more than the Protestant who kneels with a Bible in his hands when praying is worshipping the Bible or praying to it.

Hiding the Second Commandment?

Another charge sometimes made by Protestants is that the Catholic Church “hides” the second commandment. This is because in Catholic catechisms, the first commandment is often listed as “You shall have no other gods before me” (Ex. 20:3), and the second is listed as “You shall not take the name of the Lord in vain.” (Ex. 20:7). From this, it is argued that Catholics have deleted the prohibition of idolatry to justify their use of religious statues. But this is false. Catholics simply group the commandments differently from most Protestants.

In Exodus 20:2–17, which gives the Ten Commandments, there are actually fourteen imperative statements. To arrive at Ten Commandments, some statements have to be grouped together, and there is more than one way of doing this. Since, in the ancient world, polytheism and idolatry were always united—idolatry being the outward expression of polytheism—the historic Jewish numbering of the Ten Commandments has always grouped together the imperatives “You shall have no other gods before me” (Ex. 20:3) and “You shall not make for yourself a graven image” (Ex. 20:4). The historic Catholic numbering follows the Jewish numbering on this point, as does the historic Lutheran numbering. Martin Luther recognized that the imperatives against polytheism and idolatry are two parts of a single command.

Jews and Christians abbreviate the commandments so that they can be remembered using a summary, ten-point formula. For example, Jews, Catholics, and Protestants typically summarize the Sabbath commandment as, “Remember the Sabbath to keep it holy,” though the commandment’s actual text takes four verses (Ex. 20:8–11).

When the prohibition of polytheism/idolatry is summarized, Jews, Catholics, and Lutherans abbreviate it as “You shall have no other gods before me.” This is no attempt to “hide” the idolatry prohibition (Jews and Lutherans don’t even use statues of saints and angels). It is to make learning the Ten Commandments easier.

The Catholic Church is not dogmatic about how the Ten Commandments are to be numbered, however. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says, “The division and numbering of the Commandments have varied in the course of history. The present catechism follows the division of the Commandments established by Augustine, which has become traditional in the Catholic Church. It is also that of the Lutheran confession. The Greek Fathers worked out a slightly different division, which is found in the Orthodox Churches and Reformed communities” (CCC 2066).

The Form of God?

Some anti-Catholics appeal to Deuteronomy 4:15–18 in their attack on religious statues: “[S]ince you saw no form on the day that the Lord spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the fire, beware lest you act corruptly by making a graven image for yourselves, in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female, the likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged bird that flies in the air, the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the water under the earth.”

We’ve already shown that God doesn’t prohibit the making of statues or images of various creatures for religious purposes (cf. 1 Kgs. 6:29–32, 8:6–66; 2 Chr. 3:7–14). But what about statues or images that represent God? Many Protestants would say that’s wrong because Deuteronomy 4 says the Israelites did not see God under any form when he made the covenant with them, therefore we should not make symbolic representations of God either. But does Deuteronomy 4 forbid such representations?

The Answer Is No

Early in its history, Israel was forbidden to make any depictions of God because he had not revealed himself in a visible form. Given the pagan culture surrounding them, the Israelites might have been tempted to worship God in the form of an animal or some natural object (e.g., a bull or the sun).

But later God did reveal himself under visible forms, such as in Daniel 7:9: “As I looked, thrones were placed and one that was Ancient of Days took his seat; his raiment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like pure wool; his throne was fiery flames, its wheels were burning fire.” Protestants make depictions of the Father under this form when they do illustrations of Old Testament prophecies.

The Holy Spirit revealed himself under at least two visible forms—that of a dove, at the baptism of Jesus (Matt. 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 3:22; John 1:32), and as tongues of fire, on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1–4). Protestants use these images when drawing or painting these biblical episodes and when they wear Holy Spirit lapel pins or place dove emblems on their cars.

But, more important, in the Incarnation of Christ his Son, God showed mankind an icon of himself. Paul said, “He is the image (Greek: ikon) of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.” Christ is the tangible, divine “icon” of the unseen, infinite God.

We read that when the magi were “going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshipped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold, frankincense, and myrrh” (Matt. 2:11). Though God did not reveal a form for himself on Mount Horeb, he did reveal one in the house in Bethlehem.

The bottom line is, when God made the New Covenant with us, he did reveal himself under a visible form in Jesus Christ. For that reason, we can make representations of God in Christ. Even Protestants use all sorts of religious images: Pictures of Jesus and other biblical persons appear on a myriad of Bibles, picture books, T-shirts, jewelry, bumper stickers, greeting cards, compact discs, and manger scenes. Christ is even symbolically represented through the Icthus or “fish emblem.”

Common sense tells us that, since God has revealed himself in various images, most especially in the incarnate Jesus Christ, it’s not wrong for us to use images of these forms to deepen our knowledge and love of God. That’s why God revealed himself in these visible forms, and that’s why statues and pictures are made of them.

Idolatry Condemned by the Church

Since the days of the apostles, the Catholic Church has consistently condemned the sin of idolatry. The early Church Fathers warn against this sin, and Church councils also dealt with the issue.

The Second Council of Nicaea (787), which dealt largely with the question of the religious use of images and icons, said, “[T]he one who redeemed us from the darkness of idolatrous insanity, Christ our God, when he took for his bride his holy Catholic Church . . . promised he would guard her and assured his holy disciples saying, ‘I am with you every day until the consummation of this age.’ . . . To this gracious offer some people paid no attention; being hoodwinked by the treacherous foe they abandoned the true line of reasoning . . . and they failed to distinguish the holy from the profane, asserting that the icons of our Lord and of his saints were no different from the wooden images of satanic idols.”

The Catechism of the Council of Trent (1566) taught that idolatry is committed “by worshipping idols and images as God, or believing that they possess any divinity or virtue entitling them to our worship, by praying to, or reposing confidence in them” (374).

“Idolatry is a perversion of man’s innate religious sense. An idolater is someone who ‘transfers his indestructible notion of God to anything other than God’” (CCC 2114).

The Church absolutely recognizes and condemns the sin of idolatry. What anti-Catholics fail to recognize is the distinction between thinking a piece of stone or plaster is a god and desiring to visually remember Christ and the saints in heaven by making statues in their honor. The making and use of religious statues is a thoroughly biblical practice. Anyone who says otherwise doesn’t know his Bible.

Topic For Discussion: Why Is Nigeria Poor?

Before we talk about our present financial crisis in Nigeria let us first of all ask ourselves how did we get to this mess?

To me Nigeria is poor because of the following reasons:

1. LACK OF VISION: I believe this is the number one reason why we are where we are today. Nigeria is not supposed to be poor at all only if we had good leaders with vision. With all the hundreds of billions we made from crude oil & gas export over the years our leaders refused to diversify the economy, we still relied heavily on crude oil as our major Forex earner by far. If we had vision we were supposed to divest, we were supposed to be making billions of dollars yearly from tourism, agriculture and finished goods. But sadly we claim to be the giant of Africa and yet we cant feed our selves. Its shameful we import almost everything from countries we were supposed to be feeding in the first place. Can someone tell me why we import rice from Vietnam and Thailand?……. . What happened to the Nigeria that had groundnut pyramids and made millions from palm oil export? Today we import pail oil from same countries we thought how to plant palm trees???

2. LACK OF PLANNING: Let me use my friends that work in oil companies as an example. Oil companies were paying well, some people used their fat salaries to intimidate people and live flamboyant lifestyles, they never believed things will be bad in the oil industry. The wise ones invested their money wisely in real estate, supermarket, restaurants, shopping plazas etc coz they knew nothing lasts forever. Today oil prices is very low, many of these guys has been sacked, those who divested as still living well but those that didn’t plan well are all crying and begging for money to pay their children school fees. I have many of them as friends/customers so I know.

We were supposed to plan and save enough for tough times like this. I have heard people use Venezuela as an excuse that most oil exporting countries are either in recession or facing financial crisis. But what about Canada and the rest that are not facing any financial crisis.

Let us use Dubai and Malaysia as an example. Malaysia does not have natural resources like us, but their leaders managed to develop their country with agriculture and tourism. Today they have added technology as one of their top forex earner. Almost every major technology company has a plant or factory in Malaysia. United Arab Emirates is another fantastic example. Their leaders knew that oil and gas won’t last forever so they decided to make Dubai the worlds number one tourist destination and they are not even stopping at that, presently Dubai is planning to break several of the world records they already have. The worlds tallest buildings are in Dubai but they are currently building new sky scrapers that will break world records. Why can’t we have leaders with brains???

3. CORRUPTION: Yes Nigeria is a poor country, we all know that. But the little money we make from oil & gas export is enough to turn things around for good. The sad reality is that the small money we make from oil end up in private pockets of the same people we elected to rule us. Its very shameful and painful. For example I came to Nigeria to vote for my present state governor during his first tenure, but after touring my state since the last two months I wont say I am happy to have voted him in the first place. The sad part is that I wasted my time and energy convincing so many of my friends and families to vote for him, thinking he will be different. But right now I have learnt never to trust any politician again. I don’t want this to sound personal or political, I just wish our leaders will promise few things they can deliver instead of deceiving us with fake promises.

4. TRIBALISM: This is a serious issue we need to get rid of otherwise we cannot develop as a nation. I would like to see a Nigeria where people will get appointments and positions based on merit and qualification and not based on their tribe and connections. This is what killed Nigeria Airways, NNPC etc. Once you are made a director or manager of these institutions you automatically bring your people, friends, cousins, tribes men without minding whether they qualify for the job or not. Take a look at our beloved NNPC that is supposed to be a major money spinner for us, the establishment has refused to live up to its potentials because of the people managing it. If you go to Malaysia and see what they have been able to achieve with their PETRONAS you will cry for Nigeria. I have not even mentioned PETROBRAS of Brazil. These are their own versions of NNPC, Petronass towers in Malaysia used to be the worlds tallest building for many years. Do some research and see how much money Petrobas and Petronas makes for Brazil and Malaysia respectively. But in Nigeria instead of NNPC making profits, every year Nigeria continues to give money to that visionless entity, to me its like putting money in a bottomless pit or black hole.

I know there are many other reasons but these are the main reasons why we are poor. Feel free to add yours.

I Am Going Into Agriculture and Need Expert Advise

Its no longer news that our economy is in recession and that people are suffering in Nigeria, and its no longer funny to blame APC or PDP. I think the blame game should stop, because we have been blaming each other in Nigeria since 1960 and till date we are still in a mess. Every tribe in Nigeria claims to be better than the others, every political party claims they are better than the other. We are all in this together, no need to keep wasting time with this blame game, let us join hands together and move Nigeria forward. I believe we all have  roles to play to make things work, its not just the politicians that will move Nigeria forward, you and I have roles to play. I am playing my part, what about you?

Going back to topic, business has been slow because many of my best customers are facing financial crisis. My best customers work in the oil and gas industry, many of them have been sacked while some are being owed salaries. I remember how some of these Shell, Chevron, Agip and NNPC guys used to intimidate us with their fat salaries but today they are crying like you and I.

My second best customers are clearing agents that clear goods at the ports. You need to attend their weddings/parties etc to know how rich they are. These days there’s nothing much to clear at the wharf because dollar is scarce and very high. I think that we can learn one or two things from other peoples mistakes. To me lesson number one is do not look down on people just because you have made it, your poor friend today could be a senator or governor tomorrow. No condition is permanent and no one knows tomorrow. Second lesson is PLAN and have a VISION, that you earn double digits fat salary today doesn’t mean it will last forever.

You will agree with me that when the economy is good most businesses will flourish, but at though times like this where everyone is crying nothing seems to be working. So I have decided to divest, I am going into agriculture to create more jobs and make some money on the long run. I need ideas and guidance. I am looking at the following.

1. FISH FARM
2. SNAIL FARM
3. POULTRY

4. PIG FARM etc.

Theres available 4 plots of land in Aluu, Port Harcourt that I could use for a start. If things work out as planned I have up to 15 plots of land in my village which I inherited from my dad, so land is not a problem at all. I can start in Imo or Rivers, I don’t mind.

I called someone yesterday for advise he refused to give any free advise, saying I should pay first. I have no problem with his decision, but I believe money is not everything. I myself has been giving free advise/assistance to people everyday, some can be found on the internet: http://www.nairaland.com/2299535/info-all-those-want-travel

Everyday people contact me for one advise or another especially on shipping and importation business and I always try my best for them. The first time I ventured into importation business I lost money and some people duped me too but it didn’t stop me from teaching others the right things to do. Teaching you about import business will not fold my own company or make me bankrupt. I always feel happy whenever I am able to help someone or provide some sort of assistance where possible.

So please, if you are reading this and if you know one or trow things about agriculture, please help a brother out. I am a fast learner and you wont regret helping me. I would like every advise to be posted here so that others can learn as well. I will document my experience & journey in an eBook which I will share freely on my blogs.
I can be reached with the following contact details:   EMAIL: iykbethany@gmail.com  Phone: 084558815

Europe is now malaria free for the first time in years

Malaria cases in Europe have dropped from a peak of over 90,000 in 1995 to zero in 2015, according to the World Health Organization. This marks an important milestone in efforts to eliminate malaria globally.
Nine countries in the European region had been affected by malaria, with Tajikistan and Turkey having the most cases. Progress against malaria in Europe was the direct result of an agreement between affected countries to shift focus from prevention to elimination (pdf). The WHO attributes success to improved surveillance systems, better mosquito control, and greater collaboration across borders. Other regions will undoubtedly try to replicate these strategies as efforts ramp up to eliminate malaria globally.
The WHO is quick to warn that the achievement in Europe is “extraordinary but fragile” (pdf). Malaria was previously eliminated from Europe in the 1970s, but returned in the 1980s. Without a sustained commitment it would be easy for malaria to reassert itself in the region, especially as international focus shifts to other parts of the world.
April 25th is World Malaria Day and, not by coincidence, this year’s theme is “End malaria for good.” Europe’s problems with malaria were minor compared to those in Africa or Southeast Asia. A tremendous effort will be required to achieve a global, smallpox-like victory. However, the situation in Europe at the very least provides health workers with a blueprint, not to mention a morale boost…

Zimbabwe is nationalizing its diamonds industry

President Robert Mugabe, who has governed Zimbabwe for over three decades and shows no willingness to step down, said his administration will take control of the country’s diamond sector back from private companies.

“Companies that have been mining diamonds have robbed us of our wealth,” Mugabe said in an interview with the state broadcaster this week. “That is why we have now said the state must have a monopoly.”
Last month, the mining minister halted operations for companies operating in Marange, an area in eastern Zimbabwe which at one point was thought to hold a quarter of the world’s diamond reserves.
Walter Chidhakwa, the mines and mining development minister, said the companies were operating illegally, “as the permits which had been granted expired and were not renewed over the last four to five years.” Following the order, the government announced the formation of the Zimbabwe Diamond Consolidated Company (ZDCC) which it says will now oversee mining in the area.
Zimbabwe is one of the world’s largest diamond producers. But Mugabe complains that his country has not garnered as much wealth from the sector as it could have, and in the interview he blames mining companies for this shortcoming.
“Lots of smuggling and swindling has taken place,” Mugabe said. “That is why we decided that this area should be a monopoly area and only the state should be able to do the mining in that area.” The president, who was speaking with the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) as part of his 92 birthday celebrations, claimed the government had only been able to earn $2 billion from the gems, compared with the more than $15 billion that the mining companies had generated from the industry.
“To the extent that private firms were looking at Zimbabwe thinking they were ahead of the curve, this may give them pause for thought,” John Turner, head of the mining group at the law firm Fasten Martineau, told Reuters.
The move to nationalize the sector risks alienating the country’s foreign investors, analysts say, particularly China, which is the country’s biggest bilateral trading partner, at over $1 billion. The Chinese-run company Anjin Investments has gone to court to challenge the government’s decision to take over the country’s mining operations, according to Reuters.
But Mugabe disputed the notion that his nationalizing of the sector will strain his country’s relationship with Beijing.
“I don’t think it has affected any of our relations at all,” Mugabe said to ZBC. “I told President Xi Jinping that we were not getting much from the company, and we didn’t like it anymore in this country.”

Angola’s currency is the most overvalued in Africa, based on the “KFC Index”

Angola, Africa’s second largest oil producer, is home to the most overvalued currency on the continent. Angola’s kwanza is 72% overvalued against the dollar, according to a comparison of the cost of a bucket of fried chicken from the fast food retailer KFC in 16 African countries in February.

It is another sign of how falling oil revenues and failing government policies are hurting what was once one of Africa’s most promising economic stories.
The index, compiled by a Nairobi-based consultancy Sagaci Research and modeled on the Economist’s “Big Mac index,” tries to capture whether currencies are at their correct level, based on the relative purchasing power of consumers. It found that a 12-piece bucket of fried chicken from KFC costs $35.20 in Angola, compared to $10.70 in South Africa, or $20 in Kenya.
KFC is the leading fast food chain in Africa, with over 1,000 outlets on the continent, although most of them are in South Africa.
“The fact that the kwanza is so overvalued makes it difficult because it doesn’t represent reality of the economy. The problem is that all the trading happens in US dollars and getting access to USD becomes very difficult.
Almost all foreign currency comes from the southern African country’s oil exports, which are expected to fall by 20,000 barrels a day over the next six years, according to the International Energy Agency. In January, South Africa’s Rand Merchant Bank as well as Bank of America announced they would stop providing US dollars to Angolan banks, putting more strain on dollar supplies.
For Angolans, a foreign currency shortage is making imports of food and other consumer goods, which are paid for in dollars, more expensive. Supermarkets in some parts of the country have started limiting sales to just one bag of rice, a bottle of oil, and one pack of sugar per customer, according to Deutsche Welle.
But Angolan purchasing power may not be doing as badly as the KFC index suggests. A lack of US dollars has given rise to a thriving black market for US dollars in Angola, with buyers paying well above the official rate for foreign currency. When the index was used to analyze the value of the kwanza on the black market in February, the kwanza was 38% undervalued.
“A healthy black market suggests that purchasing power is higher…

How To Make Sure You Are Protected By WhatsApp’s new encryption Technology 

WhatsApp made waves recently with its decision to switch on end-to-end encryption for all its billion-plus users. “End-to-end” means the communication is encrypted before it leaves your phone and decrypted only after it reaches the other person’s phone, so nobody else, not even WhatsApp itself, can read or listen to it. Predictably, privacy activists are delighted and law-enforcement types are worried (though ironically, US government money helped fund the encryption technique WhatsApp uses).

But before you start using WhatsApp to plot your overthrow of the global capitalist regime, bear in mind that intercepting your messages in transit is just one—indeed, possibly the least likely—of the ways a hostile party might try to snoop on you. Encryption alone isn’t much help unless all the following things are happening as well.

1. Make Sure That You’re not storing messages on your phone

If you really need a message to stay secret, delete it after it’s read. If someone gets hold of your phone (e.g. by stealing it) and can get into it—as the FBI has now done with the iPhone used by the San Bernardino shooter—everything that’s on there will still be accessible. Some messaging apps, such as Telegram, have an “auto-destruct” feature that deletes messages from the phone after a set period of time. WhatsApp currently doesn’t. (Telegram, on the other hand, doesn’t use end-to-end encryption by default; you have to choose it.)
2. You’re not backing up messages to the cloud

WhatsApp doesn’t store your messages on its servers. But in an iPhone, for instance, you can tell WhatsApp to keep a backup of messages in iCloud, Apple’s cloud storage service. Once the information is in the cloud, it could be subpoenaed by a government.

And it should go without saying, but if you take a screenshot of a message exchange for safekeeping before deleting it from the app, that too will be vulnerable if your phone backs up its photo gallery to the cloud or falls into the wrong hands.
3. Nobody’s looking at your screen

If somebody can see your screen while you’re sending messages, encryption is pointless. And given the rapid spread of high-quality cellphone cameras, the only way to be sure is to be out of any possible line of sight and with no reflecting surfaces anywhere near your screen—which could include glasses and perhaps even your eyeballs. So, preferably, alone in a windowless room with your back to a wall, OK?
4. The person you’re communicating with is taking all the same precautions

Obviously…

THE UNAVOIDABLE END OF MAN

 …
With all the so called SWAG, pride and ego of man and his over accumulated fortune, here it ends: an ordinary food for maggots.
If man can take a quite time to reflect on his unavoidable END, he will live the rest of his life in total love for one another.
All the chieftaincy tittles, former this and that, Prof, Dr, Barr, Engr Eligwe na Eluala, Rt. Hon, Senator this and dat, Rev. Fr., Pastor,
Do u know who I am? Here you are! Food for common maggots!!!!

What Eritrea’s forced polygamy hoax tells us about the state of African news media

Last week, a story claiming the Eritrean government had issued a ruling forcing men in the country to marry at least two wives was all abuzz on social media. On Facebook and Twitter memes abounded of men around the world apparently wanting to move to the country to take advantage of this new law.

There was one problem. It wasn’t true.

The story appeared to have originated from the online platform of The Standard, a Kenyan newspaper, supposedly as a satirical piece (the post has since been removed). But the ‘news’ quickly generated tremendous social media buzz. There was even a photo of the legal ruling that reports claimed came from Eritrea’s Grand Mufti issuing the edict. And soon the story went viral, picked up by multiple media outlets across the continent, including such well-followed platforms like SaharaReporters.

But just as quickly, the story was discredited. SaharaReporters, for example, admitted they were duped and retracted the story. The Eritrean minister of information took to Twitter to express his anger at the “negative narrative” it generated about his country.

Media frenzy to parrot this ludicrous, fabricated & trite story of the Mufti’s presumed religious decree on mandatory polygamy is appalling

— Yemane G. Meskel (@hawelti) January 27, 2016

But this is not the first time within the last three weeks that The Standard had created a viral hit. Days before the Eritrean story, a post appeared on its website with the headline: “No more thighs! Mini skirts banned in Magufuli turf.”

The post suggested that Tanzania’s newly elected president John Magufuli had issued an edict banning the wearing of mini-skirts in the country. “The argument is that minis have been contributing to the spread of HIV and AIDS,” the article claimed.

And just like the Eritrean polygamy story, it too went viral. Publications across the continent, including in South Africa, Uganda and Nigeria, picked it up and produced their own versions. On Twitter, jokes circulated, poking fun at the perceived moralizing and misogyny of Magufuli.

Magufuli blames HIV/AIDS on twerking and miniskirts (i.e. women) #WhatWouldMagufuliDo #Tanzania #Tanz https://t.co/BFKx01AnWh

— Morgan Vina (@morganlroach) January 19, 2016

Magufuli bans miniskirts in TZ. the gods must be crazy 😜

— Onnea Onesmus (@OnneaOnesmus) January 19, 2016

Its 20-effing-16..well done https://t.co/RKJzYac5ut

— Dj Zabu (@djzabu) January 19, 2016

But once again, the story was untrue.

Tanzania’s foreign ministry was forced to issue a strongly worded statement denying it. “There is no doubt that President Magufuli and his government are strong proponents of decent dressing, but the ministry wishes to put the record straight that the President has not issued any ban on miniskirts for any reason,” the statement said. Following the denial, the Standard issued a correction. And there are reports that the digital editor responsible for these blunders has since been reassigned to another role.

The Standard, owned by the Standard Group, which also controls TV and radio stations, is the oldest newspaper in Kenya. At 2.2 million it boasts the second highest readership in the country after the Daily Nation. Meanwhile, the online platform for the media group is the fourth most popular site in east Africa’s largest economy, according to the analytics site Alexa.com.

But the mistakes committed by the site over the last month shows how the changing media economics (pg. 43) around the world are starting to impact African journalism. To chase traffic, sometimes unverified rumors with headline grabbing posts find their way to publication. And with the increasing popularity of social media on the continent, poorly fact-checked stories can go viral in seconds as they ping from country to country, diaspora to diaspora amplified by Facebook and Twitter like the Eritrea story did.

Readers + social media = viral hit!

But bad journalism isn’t the only figure of blame in this. Readers are complicit too. Especially when these stories tap into our prejudices which then act as fuel to such bogus social media-driven narratives.

In the miniskirt ban case, the administration in Tanzania has gained pan-African notoriety for its assertive new ways. But to some, this is being viewed as over-reaching. So when a story emerged that Magufuli was banning miniskirts it fed into the “over-reaching narrative” and the internet exploded accordingly.

Similarly with Eritrea. The country has been described elsewhere as the “North Korea of Africa” for its authoritarian tendencies. The suggestion that the state is forcing polygamy on its people would fit the profile, right? Well, social media took that and ran with it.

And this does not always apply when its a negative story. Take for example last year’s report about a Nigerian mathematician who claimed to have solved a 156-year old math problem. The story received world-wide attention, including from the BBC and the British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph. But it turned out it wasn’t exactly true, as Quartz revealed at the time.

But all these stories remind us of an old adage: don’t believe everything you read.

The English Premier League just spent a record-breaking £1 billion on transfers this season

At 11pm UK time (6pm ET) today, the window for transferring players into and out of the English Premier League will close. After all the paperwork has been filed, and every player has stood smiling while holding up their new team’s jersey, a new record will have been hit: Between the winter and summer transfer windows for this season, the 20 teams in the Premier League will have spent a combined £1 billion ($1.44 billion) on new players.

According to Deloitte, which monitors the global soccer transfer market and provided the above data to Quartz, this season will be the first time the Premier League has spent over £1 billion on transfers in a single season, passing last year’s total by about £35 million ($50 million). That’s about one third of the revenue that the entire league generates in a year, according to the BBC.

Although there haven’t been many big-name transfers this winter, aside from Swansea’s Jonjo Shelvey and Tottenham’s Andros Townsend both heading to Newcastle for £12 million apiece, there were some blockbuster deals in this past summer’s transfer window. The 21-year-old Raheem Sterling became the most expensive English-born transfer ever when he was sold to Manchester City from Liverpool for £49 million ($76 million). And assuming there isn’t any late-breaking drama this evening, Manchester United’s £58 million ($83 million) move for striker Anthony Martial could end up being the most expensive transfer of the season in the Premier League, as well as the most most expensive UK transfer of all time.